AFI 63-501 PDF

Instruction (AFI) _IP, Management Of Aviation Critical Safety Items; Air Force Policy. Directive , AFMC Quality Assurance; and. Find the most up-to-date version of AFI at Engineering Additionally, this AF Instruction (AFI) implements the policies in management is contained in AFI , Air Force Acquisition Quality.

Author: Goltilkree Guzshura
Country: Uganda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 11 July 2004
Pages: 114
PDF File Size: 19.84 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.76 Mb
ISBN: 272-9-13136-152-9
Downloads: 26848
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akinolabar

Document the plans, and coordinate with all stakeholders. Develop, coordinate and document validation criteria, methods and procedures.

Document program, technology, and manufacturing risks in a concise statement that includes the sources, context, conditions and consequences of risk occurrence. Document the team membership, its leaders, resources and other constraints. The definition and control of interfaces affects requirements allocation, product design, manufacturing, integration and verification.

Management to closure includes analyzing results of corrective actions to determine afo effectiveness; determining and documenting appropriate actions to correct deviations; and documenting lessons learned to support future planning and risk management activity.


Typical life cycle choices include single-step 63–501, evolutionary incremental, or evolutionary spiral. Conduct conferences tailored to educating each supplier on 63-01 contract as well as the key technical elements of the overall project.

Make use of acceptable standards. Any processes that were identified for monitoring should be analyzed to proactively identify serious issues. VG3P3 Initiate and document corrective actions Description: These process areas are supported by Goals. Stakeholders and project management should concur with selected methods.

Plan for how technical data, test results, project milestone events, etc, will be evaluated for release to the public or outside the project. Practices fall into two categories: Assessors rely upon the information developed during the self-assessment phase.


Record the parameters used to analyze and categorize risks so that they are available throughout the project period for reference when circumstances change over time. Include provisions to ensure that manufacturing personnel influence the design process to ensure the final configuration is capable of being economically produced at the desired rates and with adequate quality. It focuses on designing the manufacturing processes, tooling and special test equipment at the same time as the product is designed.

Identify criteria that provide clear discrimination and an indication of success in arriving at a balanced solution across the life of the product. The use of statistical process control is appropriate for high-volume processing. Page 14 Share Cite.

This assessment can also be performed as appropriate for different stages of assembly of components as identified in the integration sequence and available procedures. PPG2P4 Plan for necessary resources, including personnel knowledge and skills, to perform the project tasks Description: For example, requirements flow from the avi to the product, segment, sub segment, and eventually to hardware or software component levels.

Establish and maintain initial and life-cycle resources requirements for performing 63-051 and support. Specify how measurement data will be obtained, stored, updated and presented.

Those recurring topics, contained in Box 1. It also ensures that afj level requirements are tied to a parent requirement to prevent orphan requirements at the lower levels.

The second context is the logical analysis that discovers any natural partitioning manifested in the requirements. MG3 Manufacture the product in accordance with plans and specifications MG3P1 Ensure that production at desired rates is conducted according to the plan Description: Establish a method to periodically review each risk and provide current status to stakeholders.


DG3P2 Establish and maintain procedures and criteria for integration of the product-components Description: Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

For some requirements, review of previous requirements for validity and accuracy may comprise much of the effort. Ensure that operators, enabling systems, and test facilities will be available in order to conduct validation.

Use robust engineering processes to ensure a quality and flexible product.

The following paragraphs summarize what occurs during each phase of the process. Perform industrial base analysis for critical products and product-components.

Looking for other ways to read this?

Functional Configuration Audits are used to verify that the configuration item has achieved the performance requirements as specified in its functional configuration identification documents. Approach audits as a series of rolling reviews in which items are progressively audited.

Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, Jefferson Davis Highway, SuiteArlington VA Clear manufacturing readiness criteria should exist for each phase of the project and be agreed to avi relevant stakeholders. Develop and obtain approval on the factory verification plan and realistic production-rate analysis before the 36-501 configuration is frozen.

Sfi September 5 Version September AF SEAM is comprised of ten process areas which are presented in alphabetical order with their associated acronym below: