Foucault, Abnormal, p. From the careful analyses of the maneuvers of psychiatric power in the previous year’s lectures ()—with. The genealogy of the abnormal individual offered by Foucault, one linking Abnormal In Canguilhem’s view, monstrosity and the monstrous. Students of history usually encounter major thinkers in a condensed form. They may associate the name of Michel Foucault with the term medicalization or.
|Published (Last):||7 May 2018|
|PDF File Size:||4.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Historical Review of the Three Figures pp.
Michel Foucault: Abnormal, Chapter Three Summary | Theory and Play
Its title is somewhat emblematic in abnoramls regard. Intriguingly, as Foucault points out, such a gaze shifts attention away from the deed itself or the question of a person’s culpability at the time of the crime to aspects of an existence that were not themselves criminal, a person’s body and biography.
Notify me of new comments via email.
It is around this figure fpucault bodies of knowledge is reorganized. Between andFoucault’s public courses evolved in a series of interconnected themes: The case of a mother eating her own child, for example, required the expert to explain how an individual could have behaved so inexplicably; he alone came to command the expertise to detect in a person what remained hidden to non-experts.
And this failure to address her fate, coupled with his suspicion that Sophie was in some sense not even rapeable, undermines the critical effect of his own discourse on abnormality. Inhermaphrodites were punished just for existing and burnt alive. At the end of the 18th c.
From the vantage point of this volume, some of Abnormlas grand formulations in his better known book publications qualify as condensations of arguments he developed more extensively in lectures like the ones published in Abnormal. You are commenting using your Twitter account. Don’t have an account? By the end of the 19th c. The expanded treatment of abnomals case in Abnormal is more likely to fuel the flames of this controversy then douse them.
Furthermore, situated as they are between the publication of Discipline and Punish February and History of Sexuality, Volume 1 Octoberthe lectures deepen our appreciation of the books insofar as they contain more developed analyses of some of their central themes. Your email address will not be published. The question was, how can you let one go free and punish the other? You can leave a responseor trackback from your own site. In the 17th c. Reading these lectures one is ever mindful of the immense archival labor and the intensity of the discipline that Foucault mustered in his counter-disciplinary work.
Gradually the masturbator begins to gain importance. You are commenting using your WordPress. In Abnormal Foucault traces two genealogical lines of descent that culminate in the figure of the abnormal individual–a history of psychiatry and of its increasingly powerful role in medico-legal judgment; and a history of sexuality from the emergence of Christian confessional practices to the nineteenth-century crusades against masturbation in children.
What isn’t as clear from reading the two published books related to this research is how these two histories intersect with the introduction of the concept of the abnormal or dangerous individual, abnormqls how the discovery of instinct facilitates this intersection. Archived Entry Post Date: National Center for Biotechnology InformationU.
Foucault 5/13: Introducing *Abnormal* (1974-1975)
The nineteenth-century abnormal individual is the descendent of those three types described above. Abnormwls disdainfully refers to such experts as pen-pushing “Ubus”–as part of a tradition of vile and buffoonish sovereigns from Nero to Hitler whose power is not compromised by their ridiculousness. Thus Foucault reiterates the claim made in Discipline and Punish that penal psychiatry is situated within a rule-governed network of power and knowledge–a historical context characterized by the spread of disciplinary and normalizing techniques.
The genealogical function of this case is to highlight a transformation in the discursive practices concerning abnormality, a transformation that marks the emergence of an intensification of the interest in infantile sexuality and abnormal sexual tendencies and of policing sexually dangerous behavior.
Yet Foucault doesn’t feel compelled to address Sophie’s fate at all. As it turns out, there were two incidents with Jouy and the girl, Sophie Adams, not one.
At the same time as these changes are occurring on the medico-legal front, abnormality is also being sexualized. Foucault expands on themes such as confession, the repressive hypothesis, the medicalization of the family, the emergence of psychiatry, and the sexual pervert. They may associate the name of Michel Foucault with the term medicalization or remember having learnt that sexual discourses are sites of power.